

So many things are wrong with that short description. Kutuzov: A 1950s cruiser at tier VIII with 19km range and smoke.Oh boi do I have some choice words for some ships. good speed, good guns, good angling, it can make playing against newbs in them mundane, and playing against experienced players a hell. Though i respect people who utilise this well because effective maneuvring is hard to master it still makes the list for being a pain in the ass.įifth place: German BB's from tier 7 and up. Its like a trollboat but a very deadly one at that, even worse when you try to shoot it from range. It comes in third because it has a less ridiculous firing rate than the atlanta, as well as that you see few of them these days.įourth place: Another british DD, the jervis, its like fighting a drifting car on steroids.

Third place: Belfast, its like the Atlanta but on top of that it can sit in smoke and use radar. On the second place comes the Cossack, i have this ship myself, and i love playing it, but those same reasons are also why i hate playing against it: very low detection range, and very good guns for a DD, this thing will ruin your day if you also play a DD, it can also stealth torp from very close up which can make it a pain for cruisers and BBs as well. This ship encourages a very passive playstyle, or more like a ♥♥♥♥♥ play style because theres little to no risk involved sitting behind an island HE spamming tier 5 battleships and radaring destroyers through your solid rock cover. Excessive HE spam, ridiculous cycling firing rate, as well as ridiculous gun arcs and radar consumables. this ship embodies everything awful in WoWs to me. I'll start, on the absolute first place is the Atlanta.

Exept carriers because those are universally despised.
